首页> 外文OA文献 >Evaluation of methods of assisted ventilation in hyaline membrane disease.
【2h】

Evaluation of methods of assisted ventilation in hyaline membrane disease.

机译:评估透明膜疾病的辅助通气方法。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Two methods of providing assisted ventilation were compared in infants severely ill with hyaline membrane disease (HMD). 10 infants were assigned to each group. One group received ventilation with a volume-cycled respirator, and the other was ventilated using a pressure-limited ventilator and reversed I:E ratio. Both groups were well matched for severity of illness in terms of pH and blood gases. pH and PO2 were quickly corrected by both ventilators. However, the pressure-cycled ventilator group had higher survival and lower complication rates. PAO2 after one hour was substantially improved at the same FIO2 in the pressure-limited group and after 8 hours the FIO2 required to maintain a PaO2 of 50--70 mmHg (6.6--9.3 kPa) was significantly decreased compared with the volume-cycled group. No effects on blood pressure were detected in either group. The study shows that the pressure-limited method is significantly better.
机译:比较了重症透明膜疾病(HMD)婴儿的两种辅助通气方法。每组10名婴儿。一组使用容积循环式呼吸机进行通气,另一组使用限压呼吸机进行通风,I:E比例相反。两组在pH值和血气方面的疾病严重程度完全匹配。两台呼吸机均可迅速校正pH和PO2。然而,压力循环呼吸机组具有更高的生存率和更低的并发症发生率。限压组在相同FIO2下一小时后的PAO2显着改善,与8小时后相比,维持50--70 mmHg(6.6--9.3 kPa)的PaO2所需的FIO2显着降低组。两组均未检测到对血压的影响。研究表明,限压方法明显更好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号